MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/comments/1dogw5q/to_steal_another_persons_property/ladc6ba/?context=3
r/therewasanattempt • u/Interesting_Cow5152 • 7d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
187
not legal advice - That is probably fine. As long as it is not reasonably foreseeable to cause bodily harm or emotional distress. Better off not testing that line though.
74 u/UntestedMethod 7d ago What about Mark Rober's anti-porch-pirate glitter bombs? Could those be considered to cause emotional distress to the thieves? I'm just curious where the line is... 11 u/stuffeh Anti-Spaz :SpazChessAnarchy: 7d ago Damages caused by the glitter bomb is a cleaning fee which is way less than the felony of stealing a USPS package when admitting to the theft. 2 u/Mr-Fleshcage 6d ago I saw a post of a person who got glitter in their eye. They couldn't save the eye.
74
What about Mark Rober's anti-porch-pirate glitter bombs? Could those be considered to cause emotional distress to the thieves?
I'm just curious where the line is...
11 u/stuffeh Anti-Spaz :SpazChessAnarchy: 7d ago Damages caused by the glitter bomb is a cleaning fee which is way less than the felony of stealing a USPS package when admitting to the theft. 2 u/Mr-Fleshcage 6d ago I saw a post of a person who got glitter in their eye. They couldn't save the eye.
11
Damages caused by the glitter bomb is a cleaning fee which is way less than the felony of stealing a USPS package when admitting to the theft.
2 u/Mr-Fleshcage 6d ago I saw a post of a person who got glitter in their eye. They couldn't save the eye.
2
I saw a post of a person who got glitter in their eye. They couldn't save the eye.
187
u/SlowDownHotSauce 7d ago
not legal advice - That is probably fine. As long as it is not reasonably foreseeable to cause bodily harm or emotional distress. Better off not testing that line though.