They use this weird argument of efficiency to defend it too. When would we ever be in a situation where a man had to rapidly impregnate as many women as possible? If it ever came to that, whatever killed off that many men would be the bigger problem.
What was once a stage for showcasing musical talent has transformed into a platform where the bizarre reigns supreme, where men can identify as women, and vice versa, in a circus-like freak show.
Lets list Taylors Exes beginning from 2009: Joe Jonas, Taylor Lautner, John Mayer, Jake Gyllenhall, Conor Kennedy, Harry Styles, Calvin Harris, Tom Hiddleston, Joe Alwyn.
So she needs a new guy every 18 Months. Wouldn’t she make millions with her Songs about her Exes she‘d be called Hoe.
Why do yall have to bring politics into literally EVERYTHING. I swear yall just want to argue because youre always pinpointing a specific person too not just brining up politics as a whole
Probably because the author is a MAGA schmuck who is attacking Swift because he's afraid she'll endorse Biden again. In other words, it's a political article.
You wouldn't need information on every person to draw an accurate conclusion. Using a sample of the population is how statistics work.
Granted youre right Im sure there are lots of unfulfilled homemakers but having a child does not mean a man or woman would have to give up on a career.
Pretty much every family in my neighborhood had two working parents.
Id also point out if someone did put their career on hold to raise a child they still have the option to start a career later in life, an option far less likely the other way around.
1.1k
u/LillyL4444 4d ago
Written by a dude who thinks that a felon with 3 baby mommas is a good role model and Presidential material…