Yeah they probably should have been charged with treason not just obstruction

[u/Loud-Ad-2280]

[removed] — view removed post

[u/SirMeyrin2]

Because rules for SCOTUS justices are intentionally lax. And the justices know they're wrong.

https://youtu.be/GE-VJrdHMug?si=FdrZc9bbX5L7vFIf

[u/laggerzback → u/SirMeyrin2]

Man, we really need to put checks and balances on the Supreme Court. And offer term limits.

They can’t reject laws based on their feelings. They have to make decisions based on the Constitution.

[u/AngrgL3opardCon → u/laggerzback]

Offer? No, TELL them there is. Don't give them a choice, if you give them a choice they'll laugh and say no while taking a billionaires money IN FRONT of everyone.

[u/SirMeyrin2 → u/AngrgL3opardCon]

Clarence Thomas could accept a billion dollar check from Harlon Crow in front of a packed CPAC crowd, and they'd still kiss his ass.

There is video of a "woman" for Kavanaugh saying that he'd still support Kavanaugh for SCOTUS even if he was guilty of sexual assault, because he wanted to see Roe v. Wade overturned

[u/AngrgL3opardCon → u/SirMeyrin2]

Religious fuck head of a woman huh lol

[u/SirMeyrin2 → u/AngrgL3opardCon]

It wasn't a woman at all. It was a man wearing a "women for Kavanaugh" shirt

[u/AngrgL3opardCon → u/SirMeyrin2]

Oh so the regular kind of fuck head then lol, makes sense.