Yeah I was one of those idiots. Played 20h the first week or two. Tried playing twice since and it's just too boring. Don't have any interest in every playing it again. There's just too many really good games out there to spend a lot of time playing something mediocre
I was one of those people, but not an idiot. Played 200 hours in the first 3 weeks.
Havent played for a while, but thats fine because its a video game and I can just boot it up any time I want. Im already starting to get the itch to play it again.
Each to their own. Doesn't mean its a mediocre game, just that you don't like it. Lol.
When games from over 10 years ago do what you do but they do it better, yes your game is a mediocre game. I'd argue Starfield isn't actually mediocre, it's just trash. Glad you liked it though!
Your sarcasm is just indicative that you are butthurt people don't like Starfield. Your low standards are just that -- yours.
Space combat in this game is literally "shoot with lasers, shoot with gun/missile". You can do cool maneuvers with your thrusters but there is no point because the fucking enemies aim for your center of mass so you can literally build a donut ship and cheese it (which the developers themselves have been shown doing in screenshots). It's badly designed combat and that's not even an opinion it's a fact. Any time you can trick the AI into missing you 100% of the time you have bad design.
The ship builder you praised is a cool feature but is one of the most complained about functions because the UI was made by a third grader.
When GTA 3 (released in 2001) has more responsive crowds and world building than Starfield it's pretty obvious they phoned the shit in.
None of your desperate points do anything to deflect the fact that ship building is definitely not something you can do in Skyrim or Fallout.
Like many other things in Starfield that you try and hyperbole through.
You don't like it, fine. Stop talking shit though.
I mean, who would actually make a donut ship just to cheese a single player RPG. Literally the most pointless thing I could think of doing.
If someone gets actual enjoyment from a video game by not actually playing it, then great for them.
You sound like you might be in that category, people who think the game developers are responsible for managing the player's mentality and maturity as well as game experience.
I never said there was a ship builder in Skyrim, you did. Then you got mad about it. I said old games did things better than Starfield which is a fact. Cry about it more π€·ββοΈ
Imagine posting this and not being aware that open world rpg games for the past 20+ years have had reactive crowds, real class building options and actual effective gameplay choices that change the story. ππ but βomg the badly designed ship builderβ lmfao you are exactly the target audience for this piece of shit. Carry on, trog.
Reactive crowds? That crucial gameplay element? π€¦
"Real" class building options? What, like iron dagger crafting? Lmao.
Effective gameplay choices? So which of those did they have in Skyrim and Fallout exactly?
Meanwhile you ignore the new things that Starfield does that no other BGS game has done:
Ship building, ship combat, ship boarding, zero G mechanics, surveying planets, procedural generation, best selection of alien wildlife so far in any BGS game, largest cities so far, most settlements so far, largest open world so far.
Yeah, you may not like how its implemented, but thats your problem. If you don't like it, simply fuck off.
956
u/fallouthirteen Nov 20 '23
I mean yeah, they presold the first DLC didn't they (part of the whatever-the-fuck edition)?