There isn’t anything to fit the Bethesda style open world
Starfield doesn't fit it either what are you on about lol, 90% of Bethesda games have proper handcrafted words and are better in almost every way than starfield outside of graphics and combat
Me saying something is objectively worse in some ways doesn't ruin anything for anyone, if it did then they clearly didn't enjoy it themselves, grow up, its called criticism
subjectively worse. as in its your opinion. grow up, and learn that what you believe is not universally held to be important. also maybe get a dictionary.
No, there are objectively things starfield did worse, its not just "my opinion" that some old bethesda games followers that had their own worldview and weren't carbon cutouts and almost identical beliefs wise. It's not my opinion that there are less handcrafted locations that make for far more generic level exploration, and that's just scratching the surface. You're one of those people who'd say mouldy bread is only "subjectively bad", some people like it!
bethesda dickriders are the both tiresome people on the internet, like a billion dollar company needs their boots licked and every mistake defended by hordes of fanboys no matter what. Starfield does a lot of things worse than Skyrim, no debate, its provable., it's like saying a sandwich with cheese is more boring than a fancy one, its just an observation
-1
u/elixier Nov 20 '23
Starfield doesn't fit it either what are you on about lol, 90% of Bethesda games have proper handcrafted words and are better in almost every way than starfield outside of graphics and combat