Thats enough Invincible for today.

[u/Monkelover2]

[u/Monkey_King291]

How the hell do you man up against rape?, Viltrumite logic I guess

[u/ItalianMeatBoi → u/Monkey_King291]

Men can’t be raped /s

[u/jongauti132 → u/ItalianMeatBoi]

In Britain this wouldn't be rape lool

[u/DrippyWaffler → u/jongauti132]

I don't understand why you're being downvoted. It's fucked in Britain, legally speaking it's only rape if a penis is forced into an unwilling owner of a vagina (edit - or mouth or anus, so men can rape other men too). There's legally no way for men to be raped.

[u/Ok-Professional-2059 → u/DrippyWaffler]

That's fucked

[u/DenseMahatma → u/DrippyWaffler]

No there is, man can be raped by another man. Its not specifically vagina that needs to be penetrated, anything can be penetrated.

Also want to add while the woman wont be charged with rape if she forced a man into her vagina for example, but she would still be charged with sexual assault n so forth. Not a justification but its not that they get off scot free

[u/DrippyWaffler → u/DenseMahatma]

Ah true, I didn't realise that it could be mouth or anus too.

The offence is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,

(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and

(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

[u/SofaChillReview → u/DrippyWaffler]

Or using an object would count for men

[u/bigjoeandphantom3O9 → u/DrippyWaffler]

It isn't fucked at all, it's just a matter of semantics. The penalties are the same, and men can be raped.

[u/DrippyWaffler → u/bigjoeandphantom3O9]

Not by women.